The European Commission is reassuring the public that there are no immediate threats to the EU’s gas supply, despite a noticeable drop in reserves following the cessation of Russian gas flow through Ukraine. The disruption came a week after Russian gas stopped flowing through Soviet-era pipelines, marking the end of a five-year transit agreement between Russian energy giant Gazprom and Ukrainian firm Naftogaz. Although the situation has raised alarms, the EU insists that its energy security remains stable, attributing the situation to careful management and alternative sourcing efforts.

Gas Reserves See Significant Decline but Still Above Pre-War Levels

Data released this week shows a steep decline in EU gas storage levels, from 95 billion cubic meters at the start of November to 75 billion cubic meters, a reduction equivalent to roughly a quarter of the bloc’s annual consumption. Despite the sharp drop, Ana-Kaisa Itkonen, the European Commission’s energy spokesperson, reassured that the levels are still at around 70%, which is notably higher than pre-war averages. This indicates that, while withdrawals have been higher than last year, the situation is not alarming, and the EU’s storage capacity remains relatively strong compared to historical levels.

EU Actions to Mitigate Impact of Russian Gas Disruption

The EU has proactively reduced its reliance on Russian gas since the war began, working to secure alternative sources and routes. Efforts by EU member states and national governments to align new energy partnerships have minimized the impact of the halted gas flow. While the abrupt end of gas transit could have potentially disrupted energy supplies, these precautions have been effective in safeguarding the energy grid across Europe. The Commission continues to work with affected member states to ensure that energy security is maintained and that the EU can adjust to the post-Russian gas era.

Slovakia and Moldova’s Concerns Amid Supply Cuts

Slovakia, along with Hungary and Austria, had continued to rely on Russian pipeline gas even after the conflict erupted, and the disruption has raised concerns, particularly in the context of Slovakia’s vocal criticisms of Ukraine’s refusal to renew the transit contract. Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico has repeatedly stated that the disruption could hurt the EU more than it harms Russia, indicating the delicate balance that some member states face regarding energy supply. Diplomatic efforts are ongoing between Slovak officials and the European Commission to address these concerns.

At the same time, Moldova is facing its own challenges due to Russia’s recent decision to cut gas supplies to the country, which is seen as a strategic move to destabilize Moldova’s EU ambitions. Moldova’s Prime Minister Dorin Recean has voiced his concerns, drawing attention to Russia’s broader geopolitical aims in the region, which mirrors Ukraine’s challenge

EU’s Long-Term Strategy to Phase Out Russian Fossil Fuels

In response to the current crisis, the European Commission is intensifying its long-term strategy to eliminate its dependence on Russian fossil fuels. The Commission is working on a roadmap to achieve full energy autonomy by diversifying energy sources and reinforcing internal energy markets. These efforts are part of the EU’s broader push to ensure energy security while transitioning to more sustainable and reliable energy solutions in the future.