EuRIC, the Brussels-based association representing European recycling companies, has raised concerns over potential restrictions on scrap exports in response to a letter sent to the European Commission by Eurofer and European Aluminium. The letter advocates for limiting scrap exports to enhance recycling efforts within the EU. EuRIC, however, argues that restricting exports could severely harm Europe’s recycling industry, economy, and environmental goals.

Exports Vital for Recycling Industry’s Survival

The debate centers on the critical role that scrap exports play in maintaining Europe’s recycling industry. EuRIC warns that restricting these exports would disrupt the recycling business, which relies on selling scrap to counterbalance the low demand for recyclables within the EU. The organization points out that European mills have faced challenges unrelated to the supply of recycled scrap, making such export restrictions unjustifiable.

The European Commission has been urged by Eurofer and European Aluminium to take action, citing the growing volume of exported ferrous and non-ferrous scrap. For instance, ferrous scrap exports have more than doubled from 9.14 million metric tons in 2015 to nearly 19 million metric tons in 2023. Aluminum scrap exports have similarly surged, with figures expected to exceed 1.3 million metric tons by the end of 2024.

Impact on EU Competitiveness and Sustainability Goals

EuRIC emphasizes that the consequences of restricting scrap exports would be damaging to the EU’s competitiveness, environmental targets, and its green and digital transitions. Scrap exports, in essence, provide valuable raw materials and energy to countries outside the EU, and cutting off this flow would lead to a loss of critical resources for the recycling industry.

The association advocates for policies that support open trade, which, according to EuRIC, is essential for the continued success and innovation within the European recycling industry. Measures should focus on encouraging the growth of recycling capabilities rather than restricting exports, which could undermine the EU’s circular economy and sustainability initiatives.